UA93 vs. MH17
We are told by Obama, John Kerry, and other New World Order operatives that Malaysia Air Flight 17 was shot out of the sky by a missile. With eager assistance, the mainstream media is flooding us with numbers, pictures and propaganda to support Kerry’s assertion of “overwhelming evidence of Russian complicity in the shooting down of Malaysia Airlines flight MH17”. Taking advantage of the high emotions endured by friends and family of the 298 dead, Kerry is even pushing the conspiracy theory that Russia provided “insurgents” with the sophisticated anti-aircraft systems that were used to fire upon the aircraft. All of the photos and jive released by U.S. media outlets sound pretty convincing. But does an objective analysis reveal that we can we trust Mainstream Media to tell us the truth?
To expose the lies, let’s think back, for a moment, upon September 11, 2001 and compare the facts and propaganda surrounding those “crashes” with stories we’re getting about MH17.
United Airlines Flight 93
On July 28, 2014, The Wall Street Journal reported that MH17 was destroyed in-flight by shrapnel. This evidence was supposedly derived from the data inside the black boxes, which were recovered by rebels and analyzed in a UK lab by Malaysian authorities. In contrast to the current shoot-down, not a single body, piece of luggage, plane part, or other piece of commercial airline crash evidence were found at the site where the Boeing 757 supposedly crashed into a field in Shanksville, PA.
Stop and think about this. MH17 was supposedly blown out of the sky yet has all kinds of recognizable debris on the ground, while United Airlines Flight 93 supposedly crash landed without blown out of the sky, yet no debris whatsoever was found anywhere. How do you explain the huge discrepancy?
In view of the physical
evidence, these stories can’t both be true. At least one of them is a lie. How
do you determine the truth?